Mike, I appreciate all the comments you shared in your last response. I'm
replying to only one of them because I think this may be the consensus "best
practice" I was looking for.
On Sep 9, 2010, at 12:36 PM, MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote:
The general rule would be to use a different domain that is
far enough from the transactional/brand domain that the risk of use for
enduser phishing is mitigated.
Does everyone agree that this is the "best practice" for the use case provided
(ignoring I only gave you two namespace options)?
dkim-ops mailing list