I have no objection to any of the IESG's changes. I recognize,
however, that other people in the WG might.
I will try to produce, ASAP, a new MIME draft the satisfies the IESG
requirements, plus a few more editorial comments that have come my way
since the last draft. That, I hope, will allow the working group
discussion to center on two issues:
1. Are any of the IESG changes unacceptable?
2. Does my document accurately reflect what the IESG wanted?
In other words, my goal with the next draft will be to precisely match
the IESG position, so that we're only debating one proposal instead of
multiple ones. I think this will be the best way to advance the
discussion in a coherent manner. -- Nathaniel