Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard

On Thu, 12 May 1994, Masataka Ohta wrote:

The simplest way to avoid it is, quite ironically, to go back to your
original proposal to use a character "_", which is unsafe to ISO's
eye, instead of "-".


Probably a good idea.  If "_" is too weird, then how about "/"?  e.g. 
"en/us".  Just another suggestion.  Take it or leave it.

Cheers,

Rhys.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Harald T. Alvestrand Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Tim Goodwin Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Harald T. Alvestrand Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Erik . Huizer Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Masataka Ohta Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Mr Rhys Weatherley <= Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Harald T. Alvestrand Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Masataka Ohta Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Harald T. Alvestrand Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, hansen Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Harald T. Alvestrand Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Harald T. Alvestrand Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Harald T. Alvestrand Re: Suggest promoting Content-Language to Proposed Standard, Nathaniel Borenstein