At 20.06 +0000 02-02-03, Graham Klyne wrote:
There is no requirement for uniqueness in the provisional
registry. In theory, the original registrant can change
their provisional registration and if that no longer
corresponds to a wideley followed practice of the original
registration then someone else may reinstate the original
registration as a new entry.
Good idea! That is rather similar to my idea that in some
cases where consensus could not be reached, the registry
should list the different alternative views/definitions.
--
Jacob Palme <jpalme(_at_)dsv(_dot_)su(_dot_)se> (Stockholm University and KTH)
for more info see URL: http://www.dsv.su.se/jpalme/