It's true this isn't stated explicitly. I thought it was covered by
section 3.4:
[[[
The IESG or their designated expert MAY require any change or
commentary to be attached to any registry entry.
]]]
#g
--
At 06:34 PM 2/26/02 +0100, Jacob Palme wrote:
At 16.36 +0000 02-02-21, Graham Klyne wrote:
Filename : draft-klyne-msghdr-registry-03.txt
There is no mention, in the revised proposal, of the possibillity
that you record a header-name together with an explicit warning
against using it, or that you record a controversial header-name
with two different conflicting descriptions of it, done by different
people, and, of course, a warning against using such a controversial
header name.
--
Jacob Palme <jpalme(_at_)dsv(_dot_)su(_dot_)se> (Stockholm University and KTH)
for more info see URL: http://www.dsv.su.se/jpalme/
------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne MIMEsweeper Group
Strategic Research <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<Graham(_dot_)Klyne(_at_)MIMEsweeper(_dot_)com>