Re: a header authentication scheme2004-10-21 08:00:33On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:23:38 +0200, Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt(_at_)gulbrandsen(_dot_)priv(_dot_)no> wrote: (In a different message, someone mentioned that there's no reason to allow such processing before the last hop. [...]) I didn't say there's no reason to allow the processing. I said there's no reason for the end recipient to believe the Processed: header, whether or not said header appears to be tied to a Received: line, except on the last hop.
|
|