Jon Kyme wrote:
I wonder if it might be useful to separately attempt a classification of
message classification systems? Something like this (way incomplete):
It would be very helpful to have a parallel taxonomy based on different
criteria, like the one you've described. In the _same_ document.
No need for a taxonomy document to be limited to only _one_ set of
keying criteria.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg