[Asrg] Re: New draft of the DNSBL definition document

John R Levine wrote:

> I haven't looked at enough name-based DNSBLs to know.
For the five RFCI zones it's example.tld

SURBL had a better idea (because it also lists IPs):
just use 2.0.0.127 as test entry also for RHSBLs.

I don't know any other RHSBL.  Bye, Frank



_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg