On 1/30/2007 1:13 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
"Eric A. Hall" <ehall(_at_)ehsco(_dot_)com> wrote:
It might be worth putting a synchronization marker after the full list of
recipients has been acknowledged by the client in order to ensure that
both end points are at the same state when final code is issued.
Ugh, no, that's horrible for performance. The right solution is:
That's a good idea but your I-D would have to get published as
standards-track before it could be linked in as a dependency.
Eric A. Hall http://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
Asrg mailing list