On 04/08/2008 10:05, "John Levine" <asrg(_at_)johnlevine(_dot_)com> wrote:
Are you guys really trying to define a BCP for IPv6 DNSBLs?
Nope. We're just trying to define the format of bits on the wire
so when people build them, they'll interoperate. This argument is
about my DNSBL spec, not Chris' BCP.
Ah, okay, whew. But even so, wouldn't it make more sense to do some
research into IPv6 DNSBLs before defining how they'll work? Or if not,
wouldn't it make more sense to get the current spec published before adding
something uncertain & controversial?
Work with me!
Asrg mailing list