I think you're still stating this somewhat in terms of DKIM
when you refer to "sending policy" because the notion of
sending policy is heavily tied to certain assumptions about
implementation.
Agreed.
Why not simply say that you want recipients to be able to know
that a particular message content that purports to be from an
author in your domain was written or authorized by that author,
that the content of the message is as it was written, and that
the transmission of the message to the recipient was authorized?
Yes, this is a much less DKIM'ish way of saying it. I like it.
--
Arvel
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim