----- Original Message -----
From: <stephen(_dot_)farrell(_at_)cs(_dot_)tcd(_dot_)ie>
To: "Hector Santos" <hsantos(_at_)santronics(_dot_)com>
4) Migration planning and accelerating Adoption.
I think this would be part of the overview. Possibly a
small change to the first deliverable statement:
* an informational RFC providing an overview of DKIM, how it can fit
into overall messaging systems, migration considerations, and
outlining potential DKIM applications and future extensions
I wouldn't object, though I'd have thought it was implicit.
Right. I should of been more specific with my comment.
Migration was (and still is) a source contention and exploits with SPF and
in my technical assessment, DKIM will experience similar issues. Migration
related issues should be consideration in the threat analysis.
A Few Migration Plan Key Considerations as it relates to threats:
1) Test Mode: Pubishing records before production software
are in place.
2) Deciding on which SSP policies to use.
3) Well planned expiration dates.
The latter reduces migration-related exploits with DKIM.
Of course this is just WG input, so I guess when the time is right it will
be discussed. I just feel, it should be part of the planned charter.
Thanks Stephen.
--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org