Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
You cannot support two record types. It is either or.
The SSP part is short enough to be mirrored in SPF, either
inline as "modifier", or as its own record using the same
record type 99.
The key is a different issue, it's rather long, about 342
B64 characters for 2048 bits if I got this right. OTOH
that would be still short enough to also encode the SSP
You will also have administrators who put different
information in the different records.
Admins love opportunities to shoot in their own foot, it
make their jobs safer.
ietf-dkim mailing list