At 09:52 22-02-2006, Douglas Otis wrote:
While the signing-domain can take effective actions, please attempt
to list the actions the email-address domain owner may take?
I said that the domain owner may take any action deemed necessary.
:) The owner is responsible for the signing policy and may wish to
determine the impact of the policy.
Consider the effect of only having report vectors referenced from the
email-address domain, rather than the signing-domain who is able to
take effective action to correct a full range of problems that might
be reported. Report references from the email-address domain
This discussion seems to be about "Should we have an r= tag in either the
signature or key record"
A report vector acquired from the signing-domain would concern _only_
messages they have signed, and not messages that happen to contain an
email-address within their domain. For domains where use of their
Are you talking about reporting DKIM signatures that cannot be
verified? If so, I don't see how you can trust the report vector
acquired from the signing-domain.
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to