Oy vey! Urghhhhhhhhhh! Correction! I meant there is "no doubt" in my mind.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hector Santos" <hsantos(_at_)santronics(_dot_)com>
TCO(DKIM1) = TCO(HASH-BODY)+ TCO(HASH-HDR) + TCO(SSP)
The order of the processing above is important.
The more optimal model when considering order is:
TCO(DKIM2) = TCO(SSP) + TCO(HASH-HDR) + TCO(HASH-BODY)
There is [NO] doubt in my mind:
TCO(DKIM2) <= TCO(DKIM1)
The reasons are straight forward:
- SSP processing offers short circuiting of remaining
- HASH-HDR processing offers short circuiting of remaining
and so on.
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to