I'll group together all the comments that I have that, I think, should
not be controversial. I'll send comments on a couple of potentially
controversial topics separately.
Page header: s/DKIM Signing/DKIM Signatures/
Section 2.3, first bullet: add space before [
Section 3.1, penultimate paragraph: s/make this selector
associated/make this selector associate/
Section 3.3.4, last sentence of paragraph 1: s/Security
Section 3.5, "bh=" tag needs ABNF.
Section 3.5, "h=" tag, s/that is being created or verified/of which it
is a part/
Section 3.5, "l=" tag, s/Body count/Body length count/
Section 3.7, second paragraph, s/over the header/over selected header
Section 3.7, last paragraph, s/encryption algorithm/signature algorithm/
(only some signature algorithms, such as RSA, are encryption algorithms
as well. We might also want to change the label "crypt-alg" to
"sig-alg" or something like that.)
Section 4, paragraph 2, s/receievers/receivers/
Section 6.3 seems not to include reference to the body hash (bh=) tag.
In particular, it should explicitly call for the hash of the
canonicalized body to be compared against the bh= value.
Section 6.5, last paragraph refers to Authentication-Results in a
normative context; the reference needs to be removed to avoid creating a
Section 7, last paragraph needs to be removed because DKK is not defined
Section 8.7, title, s/malformed/Malformed/
Section A.2, examples need to be updated to include v= and bh=.
Let me know if I should break out any of these separately.
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to