Barry Leiba wrote:
Wait a minute, hasn't this been discussed ad nauseum with the clear
consensus to leave this text in?
Signers SHOULD NOT remove any DKIM-Signature header fields from
messages they are signing, even if they know that the signatures
cannot be verified.
Well, it's easy to sort out whether we've had sufficient discussion:
Does anyone support Doug's request to remove this text? If you do,
please respond here by Thursday's jabber chat.
Agree. And I for one will only pay attention to *clear* indications
of support. Going off and discussing other issues is fine, but not
relevant in answering Barry's question,
PS: The jabber sessions seem fairly efficient for disposing of issues
where there is only one voice calling for a change with a clear
consensus against, so there may be cases where its quicker to dispose
of an issue that way rather than have extended debate about its
originality or relevance. (Of course, if such an issue ever does
engender support on the list, that trumps the jabber chat.)
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to