On Jul 5, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mark Delany wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 10:11:35AM +0200, Peter Koch allegedly wrote:
The problem might be one of wording, since 126.96.36.199 says that the
``"stored" in a subdomain named ""_domainkey""'', where that's
the (sub)domain used to query for them. An example using CNAME
helpful as well.
Yep. In light of the possible confusion I also wonder whether a
multi-label Selector should also be discussed or inferred by example.
Definitely. In order to do stunt-dns-server tricks, as will be needed
key management for ESPs tolerable, multi-atom selectors are a must, and
it would be annoying if we had to go through a phase where some DKIM
validators got that case wrong.
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to