On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 02:29:26PM -0400, Barry Leiba allegedly wrote:
This paragraph is rather misleading because it implies to me that you must
convert to the canonical form for the *hash* function, not that you must
convert the message before forwarding.
OK; if you can propose a rewrite to Eric that'll make the intended
meaning clearer, I'm sure he'll appreciate that.
What Mike was saying sounded pretty good. Along the lines of "must
produce rfc2822 conformant output as a consequence of signing" sounds
about right.
Mark.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html