[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Paul Hoffman
That's not what Doug said. He said:
> >During a transition, it would be important to communicate
what will be
>offered and what has been deprecated. Then these
options MUST be
available or the related signatures MUST be ignored.
I specifically object to the last three words.
OK, that is fine.
What I was trying to say is that it is possible to meet the security
requirement that Doug raised without coming into conflict with base.
The security requirement here is not a MUST.
The only reason to look at a policy record is:
1) There is no security record there at all
2) You do not find one that you like
It is only in the second case that you would find a good signature and go look
for a policy record anyway.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html