Re: [ietf-dkim] punting into near-term standardization2006-08-05 07:45:16> So let's settle on the 1, 2 or 3 statements with a sufficiently broad > and strong consensus to make it clear that we should standardize them, > and be done with it (for now.) > > The two that I vote for are:+1. This is exactly what we should do in my view. Also make the protocol extensible and we're pretty much done for the initial round. -- Arvel _______________________________________________NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
|
|