8. The Protocol is not required to publish a Practice of any/all
unreleated third parties that MUST NOT sign on the domain
holder's behalf.
[INFORMATIVE NOTE: this is essentially saying that the
protocol doesn't have to concern itself with being a
blacklist repository.]
Spelling issue: unreleated = unrelated
also
This might be a semantics issue but, does this mean that, while it is
not required, it is still an option to be able to publish who MUST NOT
sign?
And if it _is_ still an option, does this mean that the unrelated
parties sig should be ignored or is it suggested that it be treated
with prejudice?
Regards,
Damon Sauer
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html