On 2006-08-22 12:56, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
Third we need to promote the idea that you should not look for the
existence or even the validity of a DKIM header as being as important as
the domain that is claiming responsibility. If you can't correlate the
domain to some form of additional information you should ignore the
That's generally true in a simplistic spam / not spam decision. If
you're making a forged / not forged decision, the record is still useful.
This has nothing to do with naive Bayes, but everything to do with naive
mail administrators looking for simple binary spam / not spam criteria.
J.D. Falk, Anti-Spam Product Manager
Yahoo! Communications Platform Team
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to