----- Original Message -----
Jim Fenton wrote:
But the signature from the mailing list adds value (it says the message
is really from the list), so many domains would not want to express that
policy. What's needed is a way to unambiguously interpret the role of
the signature (i.e., is it a signature representing the author or the
mailing list) and the SSP delegation proposal has made that
ambiguous in some cases.
Scott Kitterman wrote:
I'm still missing why we are still arguing about this. The spec
definitely
needs some language about controlled versus uncontrolled signing and the
unsuitability of uncontrolled signing for SSP delegation. I don't know
what
more we need.
+1
--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html