----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen Farrell" <stephen(_dot_)farrell(_at_)cs(_dot_)tcd(_dot_)ie>
To: "Hector Santos" <hsantos(_at_)santronics(_dot_)com>
This is quite clear. Base does NOT REQUIRE SSP.
No doubt. It is made quite clear.
That doesn't stop anyone who implements a DKIM-verifier from
using SSP in as a enthusiastic manner as they like.
Or more importantly, DKIM-SIGNERS who may also read the TA document in their
research to see "how safe this is" and see they might need something SSP.
--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html