ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Nits with section 2 Language and Terminology

2007-11-05 10:02:04
The "and how that domain signs" might be a little confusing. How a subject signs their email might be interpreted as something like "the domain always signs the Subject header field" and I think we decided not to do that. How about instead "which includes information on whether that domain signs their email and related information." Less specific, but less confusing IMO.

Fine by me, thanks!

Arvel



_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>