Frank Ellermann wrote:
Douglas Otis wrote:
the SSP draft should mandate publishing MX records whenever
an SSP record is also published.
SSP (or ASP) have no business to "mandate" MX records, that's
not their job. MX records are not required for (2)821(bis)
interoperability, and RFC 2119 has a very clear policy about
DKIM by design does not depend on SMTP. Your proposal mixes
unrelated layers. I like your general MX idea, but is is no
MAJOR +1, The MX throw in was a major shock to me, just like this
(__________) SSP-02 draft!
At the very least, it should not be a MUST.
Hector Santos, CTO
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to