Dave Crocker wrote:
small clarification that I tossed off in the meeting:
I think it's tolerable to stay with ASP. However I think it would be better
have a name that is more careful, per the kind of potential confusion that
cited (and demonstrated?)
I'd be happy to change it back to ssp and ignore this churn altogether.
Remember: each name change == interoperability stopper. There's a lot
more here than just this draft's proper place in a taxonomy.
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to