On 19/06/2008 18:28, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk(_at_)sendmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
My theory is that DKIM only applies to valid 2822 messages, and it's not
a substitute for a sanity check for all the screwy things one can send
in a non-conformant message. Perhaps it would be a good idea someday to
collect experience and advice into an implmentation guide, but other
than that, it's not our problem. Agreed?
and I would go even further to say that we should have an errata item
against RFC4871 which says we should add that DKIM presumes a
properly-formed RFC2822-style message, and that its application to other
messages produces undefined results.
Work with me!
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to