In Dublin  we had a few proposals for new work items and presentation
of some related work (Murray's stuff). We agreed with the AD that we
would not start a discussion about potentially re-chartering until after
ADSP and the overview were out of the WG. Well, we're there now, ADSP is
with the AD, the overview write-up is in Barry's queue, and Pasi is ok
with us starting this discussion now.
So, can folks who'd like to propose that we recharter to take on new
work post an I-D describing what they'd like and then start a thread
here so we can discuss the various ideas. Note that the I-D cutoff for
-00's is October 27th. Of course, if you already have an I-D then just
start a thread. Please don't make a proposal without an I-D (the new
tools make posting a draft so easy, I think this is fair).
Barry and I would like us to be able to discuss the various proposals
in Minneapolis with a view to crafting new charter text to send to Pasi
shortly thereafter if we see rough consensus for taking on some new
work items. (BTW - I suspect that if we have no new work items, we
won't need a DKIM slot at every IETF in future and so we'll be very
close to declaring victory, which is always nice:-)
And just in case some folks aren't clear - any new charter text
would just be a proposal for a new charter, the IESG make the decision
as to whether or not to ok that after requesting feedback from the
broader IETF community.
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to