On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Pasi(_dot_)Eronen(_at_)nokia(_dot_)com
<Pasi(_dot_)Eronen(_at_)nokia(_dot_)com> wrote:
(Nonetheless, for discussing what needs to be fixed in RFC 4871, a
draft containing only the changes, like draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata,
is probably quite useful. Merging the changes to produce a 4871bis draft
can happen also after we've reached rough consensus on them.)
To begin with, might be useful to post a revised -errata draft,
there'll be quite a few changes from the original now after all this
discussion.
thanks
suresh
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html