Question to the working group...
DKIM Chair wrote:
To those who voted against draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata: given, now, that
will be using draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata to move forward, and the other
choices are off the table, can you accept draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata as
written? If not, will you post specific changes, in OLD/NEW format, that
make it acceptable to you?
Unless I've missed or misread other postings, the only item lodged, so far, has
been Jim Fenton's suggest that the UAID acronym be replaced, and discussion
about that is proceeding.
Are there other changes to draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata being proposed?
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to