ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side

2009-10-13 10:28:55
On 10/12/2009 11:18 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
But all the current list servers are stupid because this are ignoring RFC 
5617, because RFC 5617 did not exist at the time they were deployed.

You do not expect that the whole world will upgrade their list servers 
because you say so?

So for ADSP to be meanigful, you have to wait that all the list servers are 
upgraded...

I still cannot figure how you can get ADSP to work in the current state of 
list servers.

There isn't anything to be done, per se. "All" just says what the original 
sender
does as a matter of policy. There are no implicit guarantees to receivers, but 
it
does give the receiver a hint that it can scrutinize the message with more
prejudice.

And for those who demand proof -- that's a completely unreasonable request as
it is part of spam/phish/etc filter's secret sauce which vendors won't divulge
as a rule.

Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>