On May 10, 2010, at 2:43 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
This looks good. Ok to become a WG document
Pity we may need a separate document for "forwarding" or can this notion be
included in the current document?
It's complex enough with all the different ways that MLM-style remailing can be
implemented. Single-address forwarding is clearly related to /some/ of those
methods, but not all, so I think confusion would be even more certain if we
included that too.
Also can parts be more normative than informational? ie what a MLM MUST do
when supporting DKIM.
That brings up the strange question of what "supporting DKIM" is.
I think we could write normative language for what MLM software MUST NOT do if
it wants to pass DKIM-signed messages through unscathed. We could also write
normative language for what MLM software MUST do if it wants to sign the
messages itself (that's pretty obvious.) But it's all the places in between
that get complicated -- particularly when MLM developers are (in my experience)
notoriously slow to add features.
J.D. Falk <jdfalk(_at_)returnpath(_dot_)net>
Return Path Inc
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to