From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Jeff Macdonald
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 7:25 AM
To: Hector Santos
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-01 review request
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Hector Santos <hsantos(_at_)isdg(_dot_)net>
So if the MLM simply follow the guideline to prohibit strict ADSP
domain mail from entering its list environment, the downlink
non-delivery ADSP problems would not be an issue anymore - no
dependency on how downlinks are behaving and have no control over.
I agree. But I'd also like to cover the case where an MLM elects not to handle
ADSP at all, and the receivers have to deal with it. I think failing to do so
leaves a fairly obvious hole.
So I'm not sure what the objection is here. Is there something you guys want
removed or changed?
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to