-----Original Message-----
From: iane(_at_)sussex(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk
[mailto:iane(_at_)sussex(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 11:06 AM
To: MH Michael Hammer (5304); John R. Levine; Charles Lindsey
Cc: DKIM
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-02 review
--On 13 September 2010 10:19:05 -0400 "MH Michael Hammer (5304)"
<MHammer(_at_)ag(_dot_)com> wrote:
I agree that if a signing domain publishes discardable then the MLM
should discard it.
If the message is unsigned, right? Otherwise, it should reject it at
SMTP
time (actually, that might be done by the MTA rather than the MLM). In
fact
the MTA should reject (at SMTP time)
rather than discard such messages, I think.
I have mixed feelings on this. By suggesting reject over discard I think
we possibly open the door up again to Joe jobs.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html