Furthermore, I'm not sure whether the DKIM WG has concluded on
thinking about the value of DKIM, what it can be used for. Is it's
purpose limited to providing input to a reputation engine? Is that
it? Or is there more than that?
Those are all interesting questions, but I don't see what they have to
do with standards development. If at some point in the future we
figure out something where there would be a benefit if everyone did it
the same way, we can charter a son-of-DKIM group to work on it.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html