On 4/5/2011 6:40 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
So if we keep i= as is in the spec, we can conclude the standard process and
give a meaning of i= outside this spec in another RFC?
How is a receiver ever going to know that this new meaning applies?
There is an installed base if i= generation and consumption. Changing i= later
creates an amiguity with that installed usage.
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to