ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6376 (4287)

2015-03-04 14:47:41
This report is correct.  The reference to the ASN.1 encoding
mechanisms document, which should be "ITU-X690-1997", was introduced
in draft-ietf-dkim-base-04 (which later became RFC 4871, which was
later replaced by RFC 6376), and the 660-vs-690 typo was in there at
the time.  I guess no one checked the reference and found the error.

Barry, former DKIM working group chair

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 7:41 PM, RFC Errata System
<rfc-editor(_at_)rfc-editor(_dot_)org> wrote:
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6376,
"DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6376&eid=4287

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Phil Griffin (via DCrocker) <phil(_at_)phillipgriffin(_dot_)com>

Section: 3.6.1

Original Text
-------------
   k= Key type (plain-text; OPTIONAL, default is "rsa").  Signers and
      Verifiers MUST support the "rsa" key type.  The "rsa" key type
      indicates that an ASN.1 DER-encoded [ITU-X660-1997] RSAPublicKey
      (see [RFC3447], Sections 3.1 and A.1.1) is being used in the "p="
      tag.  (Note: the "p=" tag further encodes the value using the
      base64 algorithm.)  Unrecognized key types MUST be ignored.

and

   [ITU-X660-1997]
              "Information Technology - ASN.1 encoding rules:
              Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER), Canonical
              Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished Encoding Rules
              (DER)", 1997.

Corrected Text
--------------
{ not sure.  take from:

     http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X.690

or the like.  /d }

Notes
-----
Phil's note:  "The reference to X.660 should be to the DER standard, X.690. "

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.

--------------------------------------
RFC6376 (draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-15)
--------------------------------------
Title               : DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures
Publication Date    : September 2011
Author(s)           : D. Crocker, Ed., T. Hansen, Ed., M. Kucherawy, Ed.
Category            : DRAFT STANDARD
Source              : Domain Keys Identified Mail
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6376 (4287), Barry Leiba <=