I'm again struck by the significant disparity in ideas of how email works
between participants of this list and in what level of breakage can be
tolerated. Personally, relegating remote users to some other domain seems
Me too. And, of course, trying to remedy that is the motivation behind the
email architecture draft.
To that end:
--- Original Message ---
From: "Dave Crocker" <dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net>
To: ietf-smtp <ietf-smtp(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org>
Sent: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 22:11:51 -0800
Subject: Pseudo Last Call - draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt
I've submitted draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt as the latest revision to
the Internet Mail Architecture draft.
Since the changes are relatively small, I'm going to ask folks to treat
this as a last call on the document. In a couple of weeks, I'll ask the
IESG to consider the document for Proposed Standard.
Please consider doing a review on the document, with that goal in mind.
Until the draft is issued through the Internet Drafts process, it can be
dcrocker a t ...
WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net