I think that the longer term answer with resigners (eg, mailing lists) is that they want to preserve the original DKIM signature bound to the From address as well as resign it themselves.
if the original signature is preserved, what is the need to do re-signing? what is the core requirement that this satisfies? d/ --- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking +1.408.246.8253 dcrocker a t ... WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net
Previous by Date: | Re: DKIM: Does DKIM provide adequate protection from a malicious domain from spoofing a sender's address?, Dave Crocker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: DKIM o=$ Outbound Signing Policy Suggestion, Hector Santos |
Previous by Thread: | Re: DKIM: Does DKIM provide adequate protection from a malicious domain from spoofing a sender's address?, Michael Thomas |
Next by Thread: | Re: DKIM: Does DKIM provide adequate protection from a malicious domain from spoofing a sender's address?, Earl Hood |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |