ietf-mailsig
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Suggestion: assigning DKIM o= policy names

2005-07-21 09:16:38

That would make it easier to converse about policy with others.

--
Arvel

----- Original Message ----- From: "Hector Santos" <hsantos(_at_)santronics(_dot_)com>
To: "IETF-MAILSIG" <ietf-mailsig(_at_)imc(_dot_)org>
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 1:02 AM
Subject: Suggestion: assigning DKIM o= policy names



It is possible to have same english terms assigned the outbound signing
policy tags?

Just ideas:

o=~ NEUTRAL or RELAXED (signature optional [,No 3rd party?])
o=-  STRONG  (signature required, 3rd party allowed)
o=!  EXCLUSIVE (signature required, no 3rd party)
o=.  NEVER  (no mail expected)
o=^  USER

It is easier to converse with someone that a domain has a "relaxed or
neutral DKIM" policy" as opposed to a "o=~ DKIM policy"




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>