----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Thomas" <mike(_at_)mtcc(_dot_)com>
According to the specs (as I read it):
a:X<CRLF>b:YZ<CRLF><CRLF>CDE
<CRLF>dkim-signature:a=rsa-sha1;d=example.net;
s=brisbane;c=simple;q=dns;i=(_at_)eng(_dot_)example(_dot_)net;h=A:B;
Does this look right?
it looks like you're missing the final b=. that is, it should be
a:[...];h=A:B;b=
Ok, finally. That did it! (Dave, the docs should show the example of a
full set of canonicalized characters like above with Mike's adjustment).
(assuming that b= was the last item; Arvel brought up a good point about
its
value if it's not).
True. A repercussion of a developer's coding method/style. <g>
if you send a message to dkim-test(_at_)mtcc(_dot_)com, it will show you my
verify
side's idea of the canonicalized bytes.
I'll check this out.
--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com