I don't question either the utility or the efficiency. I only question why there is any motivation to define an underspecified tag when the protocol can be extended with or without our blessing.
What part of x509=<url of cert> do you claim to be underspecified? The URL target is fully defined in the PKIX specification.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: The cost of choices, Michael Thomas |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | PEM and mail signature DNS public key verification, william(at)elan.net |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: accreditation, Michael Thomas |
| Next by Thread: | RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |