On Mon, 28 Apr 1997, Steve Hole wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 1997 13:20:36 -0400 Jack De Winter
Personally, I would like to see an 'onerror' command that would allow you
to try and trap an error. This was actually a nice feature on one of
the basics I used in grade school many years ago, as there were some cases
where it came in useful.
Sounds like a good idea.
I'm opposed to an "onerror" command in the base spec. It's very complex
and adds very little functionality.