On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 09:48:56AM -0700,
On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 09:53 -0700, Ned Freed wrote:
Interesting. I had forgotten about that. I personally have a slight
preference for "Auto: ", but since this is only a MAY in Keith's draft,
I could live with either.
What do other people think?
Our implementation also already uses "Auto: " for auto-generated
responses, as well as adding an Auto-Submitted header, per
draft-moore-auto-email-response . Also it seems to me that if in
general the sieve community endorses draft-moore-auto-email-response at
all, it should be done consistently.
Is the -06 version of the vacation draft online somewhere, i.e. to
avoid making remarks that have already been made? Ditto a
non-expired version of the variables draft?