"Mark E. Mallett" <mem(_at_)mv(_dot_)mv(_dot_)com> writes:
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 05:58:04PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
Works for me. 22.214.171.124 now reads:
Similarly, synactically invalid header names cause the same result as
syntactically valid header names that are not present in the message.
In particular, an implementation MUST NOT cause an error for
synactically invalid header names.
Would it be reasonable to add that says this refers specifically to
header tests (e.g. "in header tests, ...")? Otherwise something like
the 'editheader' extension will conflict with this prohibition, as
editheader says (or, at least, implies, and probably should say) that
bad header names are to cause an error.
Good point. I've added "in tests" to the end of that sentence.