Re: Last chance to review draft-ietf-sieve-3028bis-10.txt before sending it to IESG
Alexey Melnikov writes:
I actually do have one issue with a recent change in -10 which I
consider to be serious, because it broke my Sieve implementation (as
well as CMU's)
Why did this break your implementation? It did not cause any previously
valid scripts to become invalid. All it did was clarify an existing
I actually have a problem with *numbers* being case-insensitive. Cyrus
Sieve doesn't accept "k", "m" and "g" prefixes in numbers.
So I would like to poll the WG regarding this issue. Do people want to
make to make number case-insensitive, or should this change be
Making numbers case-sensitive could invalidate extant valid scripts.
That needs strong justification IMO.