ietf-mxcomp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: suggested new RRtype experiment

2004-05-21 12:20:00

On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 10:28, Eric A. Hall wrote:
If you'd fix your RPC-DNS gateway so that it allowed for new types, you
wouldn't have these kinds of problems and could fully enjoy this and all
other DNS efforts much easier.

It's becoming a bit clearer to me why you stick whole XML documents into
CID records anyway.
<snip>

It would be good if much of the marketing information in the draft were
removed.  It makes finding details difficult.

I am unhappy to hear the element of agreement reached between CID and
SPF was the use of XML.

(Pg14) The example in the draft for the TXT record is to use UTF-8
limited to a 2048 bytes of information.  I suspect this size will be the
case in general use.  Does this mean that all the information is
contained within this 2K bytes? No.

To understand the content of this information, one needs to obtain a
http Document Type Definition file. XML is very extensible, as such,
every variable must be defined.  If not in the 2K single page of
information, which is far to small for this needed text, then from
another source.  Hence the ubiquitous doctype =
http://my.definitions.com/my-dtd-file at the beginning of the example
definitions.  See:  RFC3688 for how to register these templates.

For an example:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/xml-registry/schema/host-1.0.xsd

Not clearly explaining this in the draft seems to have hidden the camels
nose under the tent.  Nearly everything is pushed into this document
including version information!  One wonders why use DNS to do any more
than reference such redirection?  But if this is to be registered and
hard-coded, why even include a reference unless to REQUIRE http
redirection?  For what is is worth, this schema in the proposal requires
3486 bytes (not including spaces).  XML is not ideal for conserving
space, and it is clear constraining a TXT record result to being under
512 bytes has been thrown out the window.

Just declare all SMTP mail servers MUST have a specific public http
server such as _ep.my.domain.com: my-host, with
http://my-host/MARID/my.domain/MS-IP-XML to include the encyclopedia of
data types, schemas, as well as the IP address list, the certificates
required, invented-here stuff, the licensing agreements need to access
the page, etc.  If the vast amount of text is going to require TCP
anyway, http is far better engineered for this, and with the use of XML,
http is already being required.  Why kill DNS to implement a tracking
tag on Mail-From? 

-Doug