On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Roy Badami wrote:
Would it be worth adding something along the lines of the following to
the end of 4.2?
I assume you meant 4.1 here.
Any MTA not supporting the Responsible Submitter extension that
redirects a message from the address listed in the RFC 2821 RCPT TO
command is nonetheless encouraged to modify the message according
to (a) and (b) above.
This is clearly what we want, and what we expect (prior to flag day).
(b) conflicts with the semantics of the Resent- headers specified by RFC
2822. This should be made more clear.
Should there be a requirement that SUBMIT servers verify that the
SMTP AUTH information corresponds with the SUBMITTER information?
f.a.n.finch <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at> http://dotat.at/
GERMAN BIGHT HUMBER: SOUTHWEST 6 TO GALE 8, OCCASIONALLY SEVERE GALE 9 AT
FIRST, VEERING NORTHWEST 5 OR 6. RAIN. MODERATE OR POOR.